Should 'www' be retired?


Ok, maybe this may be petty, but why do so many sites require that 'www' before the names? I have wasted lot sof time trying to navigate to sites by just their domain name, only to find out that I need the 'www'. What do I mean? Both of these should work:

But then why would some develop a site that doesn't work like that. For example (with apologies to Brent Rector):

Or this (again, apologies to John Lam):

Shouldn't the 'www' be retired as a relic of the Mosaic days?



Shawn
Shawn Wildermuth
Author, Teacher, and Coach



My Courses

pluralsight
Building a Web App with ASP.NET Core, MVC6, EF Core, Bootstrap and Angular (updated for 2.0)
Using Visual Studio Code for ASP.NET Core Projects (new)
Implementing and Securing an API with ASP.NET Core
Building a Web App with ASP.NET Core, MVC6, EF Core and AngularJS
Building a Web App with ASP.NET5, MVC6, EF7, and AngularJS (Retired)
Best Practices in ASP.NET: Entities, Validation, and View Models
Webstorm Fundamentals
Front-End Web Development Quick Start
Lessons from Real World .NET Code Reviews
Node.js for .NET Developers

Application Name WilderBlog Environment Name Production
Application Ver 2.0.0.0 Runtime Framework .NETCoreApp,Version=v2.0
App Path D:\home\site\wwwroot\ Runtime Version .NET Core 4.6.26020.03
Operating System Microsoft Windows 10.0.14393 Runtime Arch X86